The punishment we face is severe: removal of faculties for all our priests and expulsion from the Diocese of Christchurch, effectively forcing us out of New Zealand, destroying our good name, and publicly humiliating our members. This degree of punishment is generally reserved for the gravest offenders.
So, what accusations justify such measures? I don’t mean the claims made in the media, but the actual accusations investigated by the Vatican Apostolic Visitation, which led to these extreme penalties.
From the pulpits of the diocese, it was announced that these punishments followed the Vatican investigation of our community. Since Bishop Gielen arranged this investigation after the TV programmes, the implication is that the allegations contained in them were found to be true.
When asked for details by the media, “A spokesperson for the bishop refused to say what exactly the investigation found, but said ‘the actions speak for themselves’”, implying that the punishment itself was the justification.
The truth is, the Sons of the Most Holy Redeemer have not been accused of any crime—neither by civil authorities, the Diocese of Christchurch, nor the Vatican, even after its investigation. The “recommendations” from the Vatican lack the citation of a single canonical crime committed. The diocese of Christchurch “refused to say what exactly the investigation found,” because it didn’t find anything!
Bishop Gielen’s stated reason to us (different from what was suggested from the pulpits) was his desire to assign the Latin Mass Chaplaincy to another group, making our services no longer needed.
One of the harshest punishments possible, merely to change staff—without a single criminal accusation?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.